Tuesday, May 26, 2020

PROBLEMS WITH RAW WATER TREATMENT - Whether you’re designing a new plant or updating existing equipment, avoid these five common raw water treatment problems. Variation in turbidity - When plants begin to experience a variation in turbidity — the cloudiness of water due to the presence of a large number of particles — it can have negative effects on the quality of the process and effluent from the plant. When the plant is designed around the seasonal turbidity flow without taking into consideration any of the changes it might see — if the turbidity increases without the plant being ready for this change — there are several problems that might occur. Variation in flow - Many times, industrial companies make educated guesses as to what they think their flow rates are going to be. Many surface and well waters have seasonal variations in water chemistry. Industrial plants need to be very careful in the design of any raw water treatment systems to be large enough to handle these changes. When you design a plant for a certain process and to make sure you meet stringent requirements, sometimes you might find out later you need to adapt your equipment to account for recent changes in regulations. One of the biggest mistakes made in designing raw water treatment plants is not looking carefully at the secondary waste generated by the process. Contaminants from the feed water impact the volume and processing requirements in secondary waste.





What Are Impurities in Water? | Common Impurities Found in Water
...........................................................................................................................................
Problems with Raw Water Treatment
Five Common Problems with Raw Water Treatment and How to Avoid Them
SAMCO


For industrial companies treating a raw water source for its processes, there are several issues that can surface during treatment that we see on a regular basis.
We’ve broken out the five most common problems with raw water treatment and how to avoid them below.
Whether you’re designing a new plant or updating existing equipment, avoiding these five common raw water treatment problems might help you operate your process more efficiently down the line, so they’re important to keep in mind and plan for ahead of time, if possible:
1. Variation in turbidity
When plants begin to experience a variation in turbidity — the cloudiness of water due to the presence of a large number of particles — it can have negative effects on the quality of the process and effluent from the plant.
It’s helpful to have a consistent year’s worth of data to evaluate the turbidity levels coming into the plant from season to season prior to designing the system.
When the plant is designed around the seasonal turbidity flow without taking into consideration any of the changes it might see — if the turbidity increases without the plant being ready for this change — there are several problems that might occur.
When the turbidity is too high for the plant to remove it efficiently, it often carries over to production and can be present in your discharge, contaminating your process and causing fines when local discharge regulations are not met.
Another issue we see when turbidity levels vary, is the amount of sludge that’s generated from treating the turbidity.
Oftentimes secondary sludge systems can’t handle the load, and therefore the sludge backs up in the clarifier and shuts down the pretreatment system.
The best way to combat this problem is to design a slightly oversized treatment system for turbidity, anticipating that variations will occur.
It’s also beneficial to design a recycle system so if the water doesn’t meet the quality requirements as it moves through the process, it can be recycled through and retreated more thoroughly.
Another way to prepare for varying turbidity is to include variable controls on your chemical feed systems so you can adjust chemical feed rates.
You can also oversize the sludge handling system so when you pump out the sludge in the clarifiers filters, you have a sludge handling system that, if the turbidity does fluctuate, has the ability to manage it.
2. Variation in flow
Many times, industrial companies make educated guesses as to what they think their flow rates are going to be.
If an industrial facility is not equipped to handle these variations, they’ll likely experience upsets to the system that will carry turbidity over and plug any downstream filters.
Understanding what peak demand is and using holding tanks to try to buffer out the peak demands is one way to prepare for flow variations.
Typically, you want to design the system with an excess flow buffering/holding capacity so you can run your plant as consistently as possible and then use the holding tanks downstream to handle surges in production needs.
Another thing you can do is put variable controls on your chemical feed systems, so as your flow changes, your chemical feeders can ramp up and ramp down to handle it.
With a combination of variable flows on feed treatment equipment and storage on peak demands, you can get your system to balance out more easily and increase functionality.
If you don’t have the ability to automate chemicals, you will need to test more often. You can try to run your plant at a consistent flow rate to avoid these upsets and turbidity issues.
Raw water treatment plants do not handle variations in flow well, so it’s helpful to design the system with this in mind from the start.
3. Changing feed chemistry
Many surface and well waters have seasonal variations in water chemistry.
Industrial plants need to be very careful in the design of any raw water treatment systems to be large enough to handle these changes.
Let’s say, for example, you have a problem with raw water iron or silica and it changes seasonally.
If you haven’t designed your clarifiers large enough to get the proper retention times and you haven’t designed your feed systems large enough to handle the increased load, you’ll get carryover with either silica and/or iron into the downstream equipment where they cause all sorts of problems such as scaling and fouling.
Secondarily, if you don’t anticipate the higher seasonal loads of iron and silica and try to precipitate it out, you may then have particulate carryover to your sludge handling systems, causing them to fail.
All in all, it’s very important to understand the variations of the contaminants feed water chemistry and design a system accordingly.
Physical chemical processes to remove the iron and silica is typically an oxidation chemical (such as oxygen) and an aluminum-based coagulant such as alum that will precipitate out the iron and silica and allow them to settle so they can be removed in a clarification filtration system.
If you don’t have a chemical feeder size large enough, you may get carryover of iron and silica.
Or if you’re able to precipitate higher, unanticipated volumes of iron and silica, your underflow handling systems such as your sludge thickening and filter pressing operations may not be able to handle the increased amount of sludge.
4. Being unaware of updates/changes to quality requirements
When you design a plant for a certain process and to make sure you meet stringent requirements, sometimes you might find out later you need to adapt your equipment to account for recent changes in regulations.
This is a common occurrence that sometimes happens after plants have been installed for years.
The plant may be running well and designed to deliver a certain kind of effluent quality, and then one day the standards of the quality requirements become more stringent and the plant no longer meets the requirements at the facility.
As an example, let’s say you are feeding water to a low-pressure boiler and you put in a bigger boiler that runs at a higher pressure.
Depending on the requirements of the new boiler, the quality of the feed water to the boiler might no longer be adequate. 
You might need to ensure the feed water is a better quality and add ancillary equipment to the system.
For this reason, plants should be designed with some forward thinking in mind of what might be anticipated.
It is also helpful to plant for expansion and quality improvement and allow space in the plant for adding additional equipment to handle changes in quality requirements.
5. Secondary waste
One of the biggest mistakes made in designing raw water treatment plants is not looking carefully at the secondary waste generated by the process.
Contaminants from the feed water impact the volume and processing requirements in secondary waste.
Also, sometimes these secondary wastes need to be treated and discharged, yet many times they are discharged to a publicly owned treatment works or wastewater facility and they must meet the requirements of that facility.
It’s best to get a copy of the permit requirements, carefully analyze them, and design your wastewater secondary treatment processes and sludge handling to meet the effluent discharge of the plant water to the municipality.
Sometimes this includes releasing to the environment under a SPEDES permit. These permissions need to be negotiated in advance to be sure that the plant will achieve the effluent goals or discharge.
How SAMCO can help with your raw water treatment needs
SAMCO has over 40 years of experience helping our customers evaluate their potential raw water treatment issues, so if you have any questions, be sure to visit our website for more information about raw water treatment here.
We also have an article you might be interested in about how much a raw water treatment system might cost you and who we recommend as qualified raw water treatment companies for you to consider as you search for all the options available for your plant.

ABOUT SAMCO
Established in Western New York in the 1950s as a soft water provider. Current owner purchased the industrial portion of that company in 1987 to form CS Kimeric. In 1998, after identifying the need for an integrated solutions partner – a company who could offer everything from concept to design fabrication – SAMCO was born.
The dangerous truth about raw water

No comments:

Post a Comment