.............................................
Runway
Excursions
Investigation of Runway Excursions on takeoff, where the cross
wind has been a significant factor, usually identify one or more of the
following factors:
· Inappropriate flight crew decision to attempt a takeoff
The origin of such a decision usually lies in poor Crew Resource
Management.
Sometimes this relates to the ‘original’ decision to
commence preparation for departure which later becomes clearly questionable but
is not effectively reviewed.
Both Operator Culture and Authority Gradients between flight crew members can play a role in this
scenario.
· Inappropriate flight crew aircraft handling
This may arise directly from poor skills, especially where
the simulator training for the aircraft type is carried out in devices which
cannot realistically replicate low level wind velocity.
It may be related to insufficient understanding of the
‘basic theory’ of directional control during takeoff, or it may be related to
the use of inappropriate, or possibly unapproved or non-recommended techniques
for aircraft control during acceleration to takeoff speed.
· High rates of variation in surface and near-surface wind
velocity
Gusty wind, variable wind direction or wind that is
intermittently blocked by airport structures or terrain features can make
directional control during the takeoff run more difficult.
· Inadequate availability of information about the state of
the runway surface
When a runway is declared to be contaminated, there are
clearly specified processes for measuring and communicating surface friction.
A reduction in friction index or braking action normally
correlates to a reduced maximum allowable cross wind value and the reduction
mat be considerable.
The modified cross wind takeoff limitations or
recommendations should be published in the Aircraft Flight Manual
(AFM) or the Operations Manual.
· Incomplete understanding by flight crew of the aircraft
performance limitations or recommendations in relation to cross wind takeoffs
Aircraft limitations for dry runway operations can be
expected to be unequivocal in their specification and may be qualified by
runway width.
By contrast, the limitations or recommendations for
runways which are not dry may be difficult for flight crew to apply on the
basis of the information they have on runway surface condition and cross wind
component at any point in time. It is important that flight crew have clear
Operations
Manual guidance on restrictions to dry runway crosswind
limitations and any necessary clarification on how to interpret the guidance
material for wet or contaminated surfaces.
No comments:
Post a Comment