.....................................................................................................................................................
Paradigm
Shift
What Is a Paradigm Shift?
A common phrase: but what, does it mean?
by Emrys Westacott
You hear the phrase “paradigm shift” all the time, and not just in
philosophy. People talk about paradigm shifts in all sorts of areas:
medicine, politics, psychology, sports.
But what, exactly, is a paradigm shift? And where does the term come
from?
The term “paradigm shift” was coined by the American philosopher
Thomas Kuhn (1922- 1996).
It is one of the central concepts in his hugely influential
work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, published in
1962.
To understand what it means, one first has to understand the notion of
a paradigm theory.
What is a paradigm theory?
A paradigm theory is a general theory that helps to provide scientists
working in a particular field with their broad theoretical framework – what
Kuhn calls their “conceptual scheme.”
It provides them with their basic assumptions, their key concepts, and
their methodology. It gives their research its general direction and
goals. It represents an exemplary model of good science within a particular
discipline.
Examples of paradigm theories
· Ptolemy’s geocentric model of the universe (with the earth at the
center)
· Copernicus’ heliocentric astronomy (with the sun
at the center)
· Aristotle’s physics
· Galileo’s mechanics
· The medieval theory of the four “humors” in medicine
· Newton’s theory of gravity
· Dalton’s atomic theory
· Darwin’s theory of evolution
· Einstein’s theory of relativity
· Quantum mechanics
· The theory of plate tectonics in geology
· Germ theory in medicine
· Gene theory in biology
What is a paradigm shift?
A paradigm shift occurs when one paradigm theory is replaced by
another. Here are some examples:
· Ptolemy’s astronomy giving way to Copernican
astronomy
· Aristotle’s physics (which held that material objects had essential
natures that determined their behavior) giving way to the physics of Galileo
and Newton (which viewed the behavior of material objects as being governed by
laws of nature).
· Newtonian physics (which held time and space to be the same
everywhere, for all observers) giving way to Einsteinian physics (which holds
time and space to be relative to the observer’s frame of reference).
What causes a paradigm shift?
Kuhn was interested in the way science makes progress.
In his view, science can’t really get going until most of those
working within a field agree upon a paradigm.
Before this happens, everyone is doing their own thing in their own
way, and you can’t have the sort of collaboration and teamwork that is
characteristic of professional science today.
Once a paradigm theory is established, then those working within it
can start doing what Kuhn calls “normal science.”
This covers most scientific activity. Normal science is the
business of solving specific puzzles, collecting data, making calculations, and
so on. E.g. Normal science includes:
· working out how far each planet in the solar system is from the sun
· completing the map of the human genome
· establishing the evolutionary descent of a particular species
But every so often in the history of science, normal science throws up
anomalies–results that can’t easily be explained within the dominant
paradigm.
A few puzzling findings by themselves wouldn’t justify ditching a
paradigm theory that has been successful.
But sometimes the inexplicable results start piling up, and this
eventually leads to what Kuhn describes as a “crisis.”
Examples of crises leading to paradigm shifts:
· At the end of the 19th century, the inability to detect the ether–an
invisible medium posited to explain how light traveled and how gravity
operated– eventually led to the theory of relativity.
· In the 18th century, the fact that some metals gained mass when burned
was at odds with phlogiston theory. This theory held that combustible materials
contained phlogiston, a substance that was released through
burning. Eventually, the theory was replaced by Lavoisier’s theory that
combustion requires oxygen.
What changes during a paradigm shift?
The obvious answer to this question is that what changes is simply the
theoretical opinions of scientists working in the field.
But Kuhn’s view is more radical and more controversial than
that. He argues that the world, or reality, cannot be described
independently of the conceptual schemes through which we observe it.
Paradigm theories are part of our conceptual schemes.
So, when a paradigm shift occurs, in some sense the world changes. Or to put it another way,
scientists working under different paradigms are studying different worlds.
For example, if Aristotle watched a stone swinging like a pendulum on
the end of a rope, he would see the stone trying to reach its natural state –
at rest, on the ground.
But Newton wouldn’t see this; he’d see a stone obeying the laws of
gravity and energy transference.
Or to take another example: before Darwin, anyone comparing a human
face and a monkey’s face would be struck by the differences; after Darwin, they
would be struck by the similarities.
How science progresses through paradigm shifts
Kuhn’s claim that in a paradigm shift the reality that is being
studied changes is highly controversial.
His critics argue that this “non-realist” point of view leads to a
sort of relativism, and hence to the conclusion that scientific progress has
nothing to do with getting closer to the truth.
Kuhn seems to accept this. But he says he still believes in
scientific progress since he believes that later theories are usually better than
earlier theories in that they are more precise, deliver more powerful
predictions, offer fruitful research programs, and are more elegant.
Another consequence of Kuhn’s theory of paradigm shifts is that
science does not progress in an even way, gradually accumulating knowledge and
deepening its explanations.
Rather, disciplines alternate between periods of normal science
conducted within a dominant paradigm, and periods of revolutionary science when
an emerging crisis requires a new paradigm.
So that is what "paradigm shift" originally meant, and what
it still means in the philosophy of science.
When used outside philosophy, though, it often just means a
significant change in theory or practice.
So, events like the introduction of high definition TVs, or the
acceptance of gay marriage, might be described as involving a paradigm shift.
Emrys Westacott
Professor of philosophy at Alfred University
Author of The Wisdom of Frugality and The
Virtue of our Vices
Co-authored Thinking Through Philosophy: An
Introduction
Experience
Emrys Westacott is a former writer for
ThoughtCo who contributed articles about philosophy and ethics. Westacott is a
professor of Philosophy at Alfred University in New York, where he has taught
since 1996. He wrote two books about philosophy and co-wrote another with Chris
Horner.
His articles and reviews appear in numerous
publications, including Philosophy Now, The Philosopher's Magazine, The
Philosophical Forum, International Studies in Philosophy, International Journal
of Applied Philosophy, The Humanist, The Wall Street Journal, and the Los
Angeles Times. Westacott's work is profiled in The New York Times and reviewed
in The Guardian, The Boston Globe, and 3: AM Magazine. Seen as an expert on the
subject of philosophy media outlets will interview him. These interviews
include those on the BBC World Service, National Public Radio (NPR), the
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), and the Australian National Radio.
Westacott also writes a regular monthly essay for the popular website
3QuarksDaily.com.
Education
Emrys Westacott received a Doctor of
Philosophy (Ph.D.) in Philosophy from the University of Texas–Austin. He holds
a Master Arts (M.A.) in Philosophy from McGill University and a Bachelor Arts
(B.A.), also in Philosophy, from the University of Sheffield.
Awards and Publications
The Wisdom of Frugality: Why Less Is More - More or Less (Princeton
University Press, Reprint edition, 2016)
The Virtues of Our Vices: A Modest Defense of Gossip, Rudeness,
and Other Bad Habits(Princeton University Press 2012)
Co-wrote Thinking Through Philosophy: An Introduction (Cambridge
University Press, 1st edition, 2000)
ThoughtCo and Dotdash
ThoughtCo is
a premier reference site focusing on expert-created education content. We are
one of the top-10 information sites in the world as rated by comScore, a
leading Internet measurement company. Every month, more than 13 million readers
seek answers to their questions on ThoughtCo.
For more than 20 years, Dotdash brands
have been helping people find answers, solve problems, and get inspired. We are
one of the top-20 largest content publishers on the Internet according to
comScore, and reach more than 30% of the U.S. population monthly. Our brands
collectively have won more than 20 industry awards in the last year alone, and
recently Dotdash was named Publisher of the Year by Digiday, a leading industry
publication.
No comments:
Post a Comment