...............................................................................................................................................
Research has not proven that extra powers of the mind exist. |
ESP & Psychic Powers
Claims Inconclusive
By Benjamin Radford
The idea of special — apparently
paranormal — mental abilities such as psychic powers or extrasensory perception
(ESP) has intrigued people for centuries.
There are several claimed varieties
of psychic powers, including telekinesis (or psychokinesis, the ability to move objects through mind
power); precognition (knowing future events before they happen); and telepathy
or clairvoyance (French for "clear sight" — describing things at a
remote location).
It's the stuff of fiction and movies
— but is it real?
Many Americans believe in psychic
ability (about 15 percent of the country, according to a 2005 Baylor Religion
Survey; and 41 percent in another survey), but scientific evidence
for its existence remains elusive.
And it's not for lack of trying;
people — and the U.S. government — have spent decades searching for ESP.
Government ESP research
During the Cold War, rumors
circulated that the Russians were developing an army of psychic spies; in
response, the U.S. military created a program to examine whether psychics could
be useful in military applications.
The program, called Stargate, tested
"remote viewers" to see if their feelings and visions were accurate.
The research continued for about two
decades, ending in the mid-1990s with little apparent success.
Finally, the CIA took over the
program and asked scientists to review the results.
They concluded that the psychics did
no better than chance, and that the psychic information was neither validated
nor useful.
Project Stargate failed and was shut
down. SOUND
Some suggest that the fact that
Stargate program even existed is evidence that there must be some validity to
psychic powers (otherwise it would not have been created and funded for years).
Yet countless programs have been
funded despite never having been proven valid or effective; the U.S. government
spending money on fruitless programs is hardly novel.
Some believe that top-secret
government programs still use psychics today, though high-profile intelligence
failures (i.e., if accurate psychics are employed by the government, why did it
take a decade to find Osama bin Laden?) cast doubt on such conspiracy claims.
ESP in the laboratory
Though the government concluded that
psychic power doesn't exist (or, if it does, the information it provides is no
more accurate than random chance guesses), ESP research has continued.
Unfortunately, ESP has not fared well
under scientific conditions, whether in the private or public sector.
Early experiments used "Zener
cards" with common symbols such as circles, squares, and wavy lines
selected at random and which a psychic would try to guess.
In the 1930s and 1940s a researcher
at Duke University named J.B. Rhine became interested in the idea that people
could affect the outcome of random events using their minds.
Rhine began with tests of dice rolls,
asking subjects to try and influence the outcome through concentration.
Though his results were mixed and
hardly robust, they were enough to convince him that there was something
mysterious going on.
Unfortunately for Rhine his
experiments failed a crucial scientific test, that of replicability: other
researchers were unable to duplicate his findings.
Errors were found in his methodology,
and the topic faded away.
By the 1960s, computer technology
allowed more sophisticated tests, including using psychic powers to influence
the outcome of random number generators.
In 1976, several children who claimed
to be able to bend spoons with their minds were tested in controlled
experiments at the University of Bath.
For a while the results seemed
promising, and experimenters believed they might finally have found real
scientific evidence of psychokinesis.
Unfortunately, the children were
caught cheating on hidden cameras, physically bending spoons with their hands —
not their minds — when they thought no one was watching.
Inconclusive results
The problem is not that skeptics and
scientists refuse to take ESP seriously; indeed, researchers have spent decades
trying to find good evidence.
One famous research organization, the
Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research group, led by Prof. Robert Jahn, spent
nearly three decades searching for psychic ability, usually getting mixed and
inconclusive results.
It finally closed its doors in 2007,
never having found hard scientific evidence for ESP.
Still, others continue the research.
An emeritus professor at Cornell
University, Daryl
Bem, spent much of the past decade conducting experiments that he
believes demonstrate that psychic powers exist.
Bem tested the ability of college
students to accurately sense random events, such as detecting where an image
will flash on a computer screen. Bem's research was published in "The
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology," a respected psychology
journal.
The study made national news, but
researchers who examined Bem's studies found significant statistical and
methodological flaws, suggesting that his apparent success was likely an artifact
of those errors.
Bem stood by his findings,
acknowledging some mistakes and dismissing others, and encouraged others to
replicate his ESP studies.
If he had really found scientific
evidence for psychic ability, others should be able to duplicate it.
Two different teams of independent
researchers replicated Bem's research — and both failed to find any evidence for ESP.
The studies were published in the
journals "PLoS ONE" in 2011 and in the "Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology" in 2012.
Overall the vast majority of ESP
studies can best be characterized as inconclusive. Some studies suggest
evidence of some sort of psychic ability; others don't.
Often the effect sizes were
statistically significant but very small — not much above random chance.
Ironically, if the ESP researchers
are right and psychic ability does exist, it seems to be a very weak effect.
What's the point of using psychics if
their guesses aren't much more accurate than the average person's?
Presumably the whole point of ESP is
that it should be much more accurate and valid than chance or an informed guess
— except that it isn't.
Those who believe in ESP are
undeterred by the consistent lack of good evidence, and insist that one day
scientists will find hard evidence of psychic abilities.
That may be true, but ESP believers
said the same thing half a century ago.
Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of "Skeptical Inquirer"
science magazine and author of six books, including "Scientific Paranormal
Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries." His website is www.BenjaminRadford.com.
For the science geek in
everyone, Live Science breaks down the stories behind the most
interesting news and photos on the Internet, while also digging up fascinating
discoveries that hit on a broad range of fields, from dinosaurs and archaeology
to wacky physics and astronomy to health and human behavior. If you want to
learn something interesting every day, Live Science is the place for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment