............................................................................................................................................................
It is estimated that as many as 18 percent of people who have been resuscitated after cardiac arrest have reported a near-death experience. |
Life After Death
Has science explained life after death?
BY JOSH CLARK
In 1991, Atlanta, Ga. resident Pam Reynolds had a near-death
experience (NDE).
Reynolds underwent surgery for a brain aneurysm,
and the procedure required doctors to drain all the blood from her brain.
Reynolds was kept literally brain-dead by the surgical team for a full
45 minutes.
Despite being clinically dead, when Reynolds was
resuscitated, she described some amazing things.
She recounted experiences she had while dead --
like interacting with deceased relatives.
Even more amazing is that Reynolds was able to
describe aspects of the surgical procedure, down to the bone saw that was used
to remove part of her skull.
What's remarkable (although not unique) about
Reynolds' experience is that it is the combination of an NDE and an out-of-body-experience (OBE).
HowStuffWorks has braved this territory on the
edge of reality, explaining how near-death experiences work and how a person can have an out-of-body experience.
Science, too, has made its own headway toward
explaining these weird phenomena.
Two studies on the separate aspects of Reynolds'
experience were conducted in 2007.
Each seems to explain how a person can have an
OBE or a NDE, but do they hold up in explaining experiences like Reynolds'?
While many religious adherents might not be
surprised by these accounts, the idea that human consciousness and the body
exist distinctly from each other flies in the face of science.
A brain-dead person should not be able to form
new memories -- he shouldn't have any consciousness at all, really.
So how can anything but a metaphysical
explanation cover NDEs?
A study from the University of Kentucky has
quickly gained ground among scientists as possibly the best explanation for
NDEs.
Researchers there theorize that the mysterious
phenomenon is really an instance of the sleep disorder rapid eye
movement (REM) intrusion.
In this disorder, a person's mind can wake up
before his body, and hallucinations and the feeling of being physically
detached from his body can occur.
The Kentucky researchers believe that NDEs are
actually REM intrusions triggered in the brain by traumatic events like cardiac
arrest.
If this is true, then this means the experiences
of some people following near-death are confusion from suddenly and
unexpectedly entering a dream-like state.
This theory helps explain what has always been a
tantalizing aspect of the mystery of NDEs: how people can experience sights and
sounds after confirmed brain death.
The area where REM intrusion is triggered is found
in the brain stem -- the region that controls the most basic
functions of the body -- and it can operate virtually independent from the
higher brain.
So even after the higher regions of the brain
are dead, the brain stem can conceivably continue to function, and REM
intrusion could still occur.
This sounds like a good explanation for NDEs,
but what about OBEs? Are they the same thing? Read the next page to discover
the distinctions between near-death and out-of-body experiences.
Research shows that different parts of the brain
are most likely responsible for out-of-body experiences and near-death
experiences.
While the REM intrusion theory for near-death experiences explains the apparent
hallucinations that accompany NDEs, another aspect remains a mystery.
How can a person watch his body after he dies?
Though out-of-body experiences are sometimes
reported as part of the near-death experience, they can also stand alone,
indicating that they are a different animal than NDEs.
This is supported by a bit of accidental
research.
To find the cause of a 43-year-old epileptic
patient's seizures, Swiss neurologist Dr. Olaf Blanke conducted a brain
mapping test using electrodes planted on the brain to
determine which area controls what function.
As one region was being stimulated, the woman had
a sudden out-of-body experience. She told Blanke that she could see herself
from above.
Blanke determined that by electrically
stimulating the woman's angular gyrus, a part of the temporal
parietal junction, he could induce her OBEs.
What's remarkable is that the patient
experienced an OBE each time her angular gyrus was arbitrarily stimulated.
At any given time, the brain is assaulted with
information.
As a result, we become desensitized to the
sights and sounds around us, such as the buzz of a fluorescent light.
The temporal parietal junction (TPJ)
is responsible for sorting through this disparate information and putting it
together into a coherent package.
The TPJ also happens to be the region that
controls our comprehension of our own body and its situation in space.
Blanke believes that a misfiring of this region
is responsible for OBEs.
If any of the information being sorted by the
temporal parietal junction becomes crossed, like where we are in space, then we
could seemingly be released from the confines of our body -- even if only for a
moment.
Both Blanke's and the University of Kentucky
theories explain OBEs and NDEs.
But what about when you put the two together as
an explanation for experiences like that of Pam Reynolds?
This still does not resolve how Pam Reynolds and
others like her view themselves outside of their bodies while they were
brain-dead.
NDEs may be a result of REM intrusion, triggered
in the brain stem.
But OBEs are controlled by a region of the
higher brain, which is clinically dead when NDEs occur.
What's more, it seems logical to believe that
the higher brain must still function in order to interpret the sensations
produced by the REM intrusion triggered in the brain stem.
Even though combining the University of Kentucky
and Blanke theories does not produce an explanation for NDEs, it does not mean
that either theory is wrong.
Research in one area often leads to a
breakthrough in another. Perhaps we will find out that an organic function is
indeed behind NDEs.
If neurology does come up with the definitive
explanation for NDEs, the mystery may still remain.
Science could explain the "how," while
leaving the "why" unanswered.
Discovering an explanation for NDEs may reveal a
door to the metaphysical world, which could possibly be unlocked -- and
explored -- by science.
As physician Dr. Melvin Morse
wrote, "Simply because religious experiences are brain-based does
not automatically lessen or demean their spiritual significance. Indeed, the
findings of neurological substrates to religious experiences can be argued to
provide evidence for their objective reality".
Josh
Clark has wanted to be a professional
writer since his third-grade teacher told him a short story he wrote was kind
of good. He's written ever since. At HowStuffWorks.com, he's a senior writer
and co-host of the Stuff You Should Know podcast. Josh lives with his wife,
Umi. The pair really, really enjoys traveling, solving mysteries, having pizza
parties and visiting museums (both renowned and obscure). Josh has been to the
real-life house that served as the Robin's Nest on "Magnum, P.I." and
is on an indefinite hiatus from being a jerk.
No comments:
Post a Comment