.................................................................................................................................................................
Spontaneous
Generation
Is
Spontaneous Generation Real?
By Regina Bailey
For several centuries it
was believed that living organisms could spontaneously come from
nonliving matter.
This idea, known as
spontaneous generation, is now known to be false.
Proponents of at least
some aspects of spontaneous generation included well-respected philosophers and
scientists such as Aristotle, Rene Descartes, William Harvey, and Isaac Newton.
Spontaneous generation
was a popular notion due to the fact that it seemed to be consistent with
observations that a number of animal organisms would apparently arise
from nonliving sources.
Spontaneous generation
was disproved through the performance of several significant scientific
experiments.
Key Takeaways
· Spontaneous
generation is the idea that living organisms can spontaneously come from
nonliving matter.
· Over
the years, great minds like Aristotle and Isaac Newton were proponents of some
aspects of spontaneous generation which have all been shown to be false.
· Francesco
Redi did an experiment with meat and maggots and concluded that maggots do not
arise spontaneously from rotting meat.
· The
Needham and the Spallanzani experiments were additional experiments that were
conducted to help disprove spontaneous generation.
· The
Pasteur experiment was the most famous experiment conducted that disproved
spontaneous generation that was accepted by the majority of the scientific
community. Pasteur demonstrated that bacteria appearing in broth are not the
result of spontaneous generation.
Do
Animals Spontaneously Generate?
Prior to the mid-19th
century, it was commonly believed that the origin of certain animals was from
nonliving sources.
Lice were thought to come
from dirt or sweat.
Worms, salamanders, and
frogs were thought to be birthed from the mud.
Maggots were derived from
rotting meat, aphids and beetles supposedly sprang from wheat, and mice were
generated from soiled clothing mixed with wheat grains.
While these theories seem
quite ludicrous, at the time they were thought to be reasonable explanations
for how certain bugs and other animals seemed to appear
from no other living matter.
Spontaneous
Generation Debate
While a popular theory
throughout history, spontaneous generation was
not without its critics.
Several scientists set
out to refute this theory through scientific experimentation.
At the same time, other
scientists tried to find evidence in support of spontaneous generation. This
debate would last for centuries.
Redi
Experiment
In 1668, the Italian
scientist and physician Francesco Redi set out to disprove the
hypothesis that maggots were spontaneously generated from rotting meat.
He contended that the
maggots were the result of flies laying eggs on exposed meat.
In his experiment, Redi placed
meat in several jars. Some jars were left uncovered, some were covered with
gauze, and some were sealed with a lid.
Over time, the meat in
the uncovered jars and the jars covered with gauze became infested with
maggots.
However, the meat in the
sealed jars did not have maggots.
Since only the meat that
was accessible to flies had maggots, Redi concluded that maggots do not
spontaneously arise from meat.
Needham
Experiment
In 1745, English
biologist and priest John Needham set out to demonstrate that microbes, such
as bacteria, were the result of spontaneous
generation.
Thanks to the invention
of the microscope in the 1600s and increased improvements to its usage,
scientists were able to view microscopic organisms such as fungi, bacteria, and protists.
In his experiment,
Needham heated chicken broth in a flask in order to kill any living organisms
within the broth. He allowed the broth to cool and placed it in a sealed flask.
Needham also placed
unheated broth in another container. Over time, both the heated broth and
unheated broth contained microbes.
Needham was convinced
that his experiment had proven spontaneous generation in microbes.
Spallanzani
Experiment
In 1765, Italian
biologist and priest Lazzaro Spallanzani, set out to demonstrate that microbes
do not spontaneously generate.
He contended that
microbes are capable of moving through the air.
Spallanzani believed that
microbes appeared in Needham's experiment because the broth had been exposed to
air after boiling but before the flask had been sealed.
Spallanzani devised an
experiment where he placed the broth in a flask, sealed the flask, and removed
the air from the flask before boiling.
The results of his
experiment showed that no microbes appeared in the broth as long as it remained
in its sealed condition.
While it appeared that
the results of this experiment had dealt a devastating blow to the idea of
spontaneous generation in microbes,
Needham argued that it
was the removal of air from the flask that made spontaneous generation
impossible.
Pasteur
Experiment
In 1861, Louis Pasteur presented evidence that
would virtually put an end to the debate.
He designed an experiment
similar to Spallanzani's, however, Pasteur's experiment implemented a way to
filter out microorganisms.
Pasteur used a flask with
a long, curved tube called a swan-necked flask. This flask allowed air to have
access to the heated broth while trapping dust containing bacterial spores in the curved neck of the tube.
The results of this
experiment were that no microbes grew in the broth.
When Pasteur tilted the
flask on its side allowing the broth access to the curved neck of the tube and
then set the flask upright again, the broth became contaminated and bacteria reproduced in the broth.
Bacteria also appeared in
the broth if the flask was broken near the neck allowing the broth to be exposed
to non-filtered air.
This experiment
demonstrated that bacteria appearing in broth are not the result of spontaneous
generation.
The majority of the
scientific community considered this conclusive evidence against spontaneous
generation and proof that living organisms only arise from living organisms.
Regina Bailey , RN
Biology Expert
Education
B.A., Biology, Emory
University
A.S., Nursing, Chattahoochee
Technical College
Introduction
Biology expert for ThoughtCo
(formerly About Education) since 1997
Author of the forward
to The Complete Idiot's Guide to Understanding Cloning
Experience
Regina is a board-certified
registered nurse and owner of a content development firm specializing in
the development of biology and science-related content. She has written about
biology for ThoughtCo (formerly About Education) since 1997.
Regina's expertise has been
featured and/or referenced in Kaplan AP Biology 2016, The Internet for
Cellular and Molecular Biologists, and The Seven Disciplines of Wellness: The
Spiritual Connection to Good Health.
Regina also wrote the forward
to The Complete Idiot's Guide to Understanding Cloning.
Education
Regina holds a B.A. in biology
from Emory University and an A.S. in Nursing from Chattahoochee Technical
College.
ThoughtCo and Dotdash
ThoughtCo is a premier
reference site focusing on expert-created education content. We are one of the
top-10 information sites in the world as rated by comScore, a leading Internet
measurement company. Every month, more than 13 million readers seek answers to
their questions on ThoughtCo.
For more than 20 years, Dotdash brands
have been helping people find answers, solve problems, and get inspired. We are
one of the top-20 largest content publishers on the Internet according to
comScore, and reach more than 30% of the U.S. population monthly. Our brands
collectively have won more than 20 industry awards in the last year alone, and
recently Dotdash was named Publisher of the Year by Digiday, a leading industry
publication.
No comments:
Post a Comment